Planning matters

Our award winning blog gives a fresh perspective on the latest trends in planning and development.

Take a chance on me: what we know about permission in principle on application
Update 15 June 2018: The Government has published updated guidance on permission in principle – notably the application procedures for PiP and technical details consent.  The complete up-to-date guidance is available here. On 1 June 2018 a new route for obtaining planning permission via an application will become available for most small, housing-led developments: an application for permission in principle (PIP) followed by an application for technical details consent (TDC). On that day, the Town and Country Planning (Permission in Principle) (Amendment) Order 2017(‘PIP Amendment Order’) will come into force. And by that time, the PIP and TDC route will have been in primary legislation for over two years, and PIP via local authority brownfield land registers will have been available for several months, so one would hope it will not be a completely new concept for the property sector – and particularly small builders - to grapple with and consider using. Notwithstanding this hoped-for familiarity with PIPs, the new application route is one of the most significant changes to the way planning permission may be achieved since outline planning applications were introduced almost 60 years ago. Our May 2016 Guide to PIPsprovides the background, and our subsequent March 2017 Guide(updated in January 2018) explains how PIPs can be granted via brownfield land registers. Of the three routes to PIP that are provided by s59A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, only one is already available a present: permission in principle granted via Part 2 of the brownfield land register. The three routes to PIP will be mutually exclusive; i.e. PIP on application will be available to any site that might accommodate minor housing-led development, provided the development is not habitats development, EIA development or major development (as defined in the PIP Amendment Order). It is not the case that it will be available only to sites in Part 1 of a brownfield land register (sites in Part 2 already have PIP), or (in future) to sites granted PIP via a local plan allocation or a neighbourhood plan allocation (these too will already have PIP). Small sites only Applications for PIP for minor developments (of nine residential units or less, with less than 1000sqm of commercial floorspace, and/or on a site of less than 1ha), the ‘main purpose’ of which is housing development, may be submitted to local planning authorities (LPAs) from 1 June 2018 onwards. ‘Main purpose’ is not defined in the amendment Order; perhaps guidance will indicate that it will relate to the site area proposed for housing, as compared to other proposed uses.  Applications for PIP cannot be made for major, ‘habitats’, householder, or Schedule 1 EIA development. PIP can be granted for Schedule 2 EIA development, providing that a screening opinion that the proposal is not EIA development has been adopted or made. In for a penny… The premise for PIP via the application route is slightly unusual; essentially it is presented as a cheaper way for those taking a chance on smaller (more risky?) sites to establish whether a site is suitable for new homes, or not. According to the Explanatory Memorandum (EM) to the Amendment Order 2017: …we [the Government] estimate a developer of a four dwelling site that chooses to take up the new option to apply for permission in principle will incur an additional cost of £800 in an instance where permission in principle is granted but will save on average £22,000 in an instance where permission in principle is refused. Pre-application advice is the current process for a developer trying to reduce planning risk, which is effectively the benefit PIP provides. Pre-application advice in respect of a PIP on application would add another layer of costs, and does not appear to be envisaged by Government in the estimates above. The Government will provide guidance for PIP applications, including the information to be submitted with an application. And the EM explains that LPAs will be supported by an ‘active programme of continuous engagement to coincide with the coming into force of the Order’. Fees The Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications, Deemed Applications, Requests and Site Visits) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2017 - in force from 17 January 2018 – introduce a fee for PIP of £402 per 0.1 of a hectare. This fee will apply to PIP proposals falling within Categories 1-3 of the amendment Fee Regulations: 1. erection of houses; 2. erection of buildings (other than houses, agricultural buildings, glasshouses, plant or machinery and ‘other operations’); and 3. erection of agricultural buildings. It is not clear why the Fee Regulations refer only to these three categories, and why material change of use in particular (categories 11, 12 and 13) is not directly referred to, given that PIP may be sought for a change of use. The fee for non-material amendments to a PIP or TDC is/will be £195. The fee exemptions that will apply to a second application for PIP relating to development on the same site as a first application, and following withdrawal of an application or refusal, are very similar to the exemptions of this type that apply to planning and reserved matters approval applications (see Fee Regulations 8 and 9). An exemption might apply to a TDC application where both the first and second applications were TDC applications (i.e. not to a TDC application that follows the withdrawal or refusal of an application for planning permission that was not a TDC application). The Planning Guarantee of a 26 week determination period (see Fee Regulation 9A) will apply to PIP on application and TDC. Procedure An application for PIP will have to be made on a form published by the Secretary of State (or a form to substantially the same effect). If a decision is not made within 5 weeks of receipt of a valid application, and no extension of time has been agreed, the applicant may appeal to the Secretary of State for non-determination. We can see no reason why from 1 June this year an application for PIP could not be submitted in respect of a site, or part of a site that is listed in Part 1 of a brownfield land register, and for a different range of units/development to that described in Part 1, providing that all the requirements on site size, number of units etc are met. There will be a right of appeal against refusal of an application for a PIP (but not for refusal to grant PIP via brownfield land register, or via a development plan allocation) (s78(1)(aa)). Once a PIP has been granted, it ‘ceases to have effect’ after three years, unless a longer or shorter time limit is directed on the decision notice. TDC relating to the proposed development must be granted prior to the expiry of the PIP and must be determined in accordance with the PIP unless three years have passed since the PIP came into effect and material circumstances have changed since that time. A TDC will be subject to a standard time limit of three years (as per s91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended), unless a longer or shorter period is imposed by the LPA. As noted above, a non-material amendment may be sought to a PIP or TDC. A minor material amendment, achieved via a s73 application, is possible for a TDC, because it is a planning permission. A PIP is not a planning permission (it is the stage before planning permission), and therefore a s73 planning application may not be made (s73 applies ‘to applications for planning permission for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted’).  In our view, Pressland v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2016), which confirmed the scope of s73, does not assist. In Pressland, it was concluded that conditions attached to a planning permission can be amended however that planning permission was achieved, as can conditions attached to approvals required by a condition of planning permission. Any conditions attached to a PIP will be conditions required of a planning permission i.e. for requirements at TDC application stage. Time for knowledge sharing and best practice? The PIP Amendment Order was originally intended to come into force on the same day as the amendment Fee Regulations, “so that LPAs can charge a fee for PIP applications” (see footnote 1 on page 9 of the Explanatory Memorandum of the draft amendment Fee Regulations). The “active programme of continuous engagement” referred to in the EM to the made Order is probably part of the reason for a delay. Hopefully it is a delay that will initiate discussion and then lead to clarity for all parties on PIP application procedure and process, ready for 1 June.

CONTINUE READING

Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017: essential guide to future changes to development management
19 July 2017 update: the first Regulations commencing a series of provisions in the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 were laid on 18 July and are already in force. Of the Act’s development management changes, the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 (Commencement No. 1) Regulations 2017 mean that the Secretary of State (SoS) can now go ahead and make another set of regulations that will be about what kind of conditions may or may not be imposed on a grant of planning permission (s14 of the Act). Regulations can be made now too, governing the circumstances when the agreement of an applicant has to be obtained in advance and when it does not, to the terms of a pre-commencement condition. Also, s1 is now in force so that a local planning authority has to have regard to a ‘post-examination’, unmade neighbourhood development plan (‘neighbourhood plan’) as a material consideration in the determination of planning applications. With s3 now in force too, it is the case that just prior to a draft neighbourhood plan being made after succeeding at referendum, the Plan forms part of the development plan (but it would not continue to do so if the LPA were to decide it should not be made). S16 of the Act has now amended the New Towns Act 1981, so that the SoS can transfer the overseeing of new town development corporations established under that Act to one or more local authorities covering the New Town area. The SoS can also now make further Regulations for how a local authority should then go about overseeing the New Town’s development. This guide provides a summary of the measures in the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 that relate to development management procedures in England, other than those for planning conditions – covered in Lichfields’ ‘essential guide to future changes - the use of conditions’.  Also affecting development management are the Act’s provisions that will alter: the status and materiality of draft neighbourhood plans at given stages; requirements for notification for neighbourhood planning bodies; and local authority planning registers.  The new legal requirement to further amend the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2015 (as amended), to alter permitted development rights (PDRs) for pubs and other drinking establishments, has already been fulfilled by amendments in force from 23 May. Lichfields’ ‘essential guide to changes to plan-making’ covers the changes relating to local plans and neighbourhood plans that will arise from the Act. Changes to the materiality and status of advanced draft neighbourhood plans Once section 3 is brought into force, a draft neighbourhood development plan (‘neighbourhood plan’) will become part of the development plan just before being made, once it has succeeded at referendum (but it would not continue to do so, if the local planning authorities (LPA) decides it should not be made). And prior to that, a ‘post-examination’, unmade neighbourhood plan will have to be taken into account in the determination of planning applications when section 1 is brought into force. The Act defines a post-examination neighbourhood plan and stipulates when a draft neighbourhood plan would cease to be considered to be a post-examination neighbourhood plan.  These sections should be read in the context of past appeal decisions not always being in line with advanced draft neighbourhood plans (see the Housing and Planning Minister’s jovial reference to a ‘Malthouse clause’), and a perception that some authorities are not doing enough to support neighbourhood planning (hence the other neighbourhood planning provisions in the Act). The inclusion of an unmade plan in the statutory development plan is a significant conceptual and legal change, but not an enormous leap in practice, as it is likely that very significant weight would be attached to such an advanced draft neighbourhood plan as a material consideration in any event. Indeed, at the fourth sitting of the Commons Committee stage  the Housing and Planning Minister quoted para 216 of the NPPF, regarding the weight to be given to emerging plans, in order to “help” the Committee to understand the provision. And regarding the weight to give a draft plan, Baroness Parminter noted at Committee Stage in the Lords: “Clause 1 says that local authorities “must have regard” to neighbourhood development plans, but there are no sanctions. Furthermore, this applies only to post-examined plans, whereas case law says that draft plans should be taken into account.” The Housing and Planning Minister had previously explained that (the then) Clause 1 was about giving communities the confidence, through legislation rather than guidance, that their neighbourhood plans “will get proper consideration in planning decisions, where the plan is material to the application” because the hours communities put in to preparing them should be “recognised in the system at the earliest possible opportunity”.  Therefore the provision in section 3 in particular is more about motivating communities and ‘sending a message’, than about making a significant change to the weight to be given to neighbourhood plans. As Mr Barwell said towards the end of the Bill’s passage: “We want to ensure that this process helps people who give up their spare time and put effort into producing neighbourhood plans to get the result they want in terms of how their local community develops.” Notification arrangements for sites where there is a neighbourhood plan, or a post-examination draft neighbourhood plan Once all of section 2 is in force, LPAs must notify parish councils and neighbourhood forums of applications for planning permission, permission in principle (PIP) or reserved matters approval (and any alterations to those applications), on land where there is a draft neighbourhood plan, or a post-examination draft neighbourhood plan, unless the parish council has advised the LPA that it wishes to be notified of certain applications, or does not wish to be notified at all.  The requirement does not extend to technical details consent applications that follow PIP, which is an interesting omission given the Government’s intention that mandatory engagement at the technical details stage will be “proportionate” and its desire to promote engagement with neighbourhood planning to LPAs. This provision, which amends/will amend Schedule 1 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, will operate alongside the pre-existing requirement in Schedule 1 to notify parish councils and neighbourhood forums of planning applications and reserved matters approval applications (and any alterations to those applications) where they have requested to be notified. The amendment to Schedule 1 in force thus far, only has the effect of allowing changes to the automatic notification procedure to be set out in the amendments to the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (Articles 25 and 25A).  We are seeking clarification as to which sub-sections of section 2 have been brought into force, and understand that it is section 2(1-5). Planning register Section 17 permits regulations requiring LPAs to include prior approval applications, decisions and notifications on their planning registers –whether the authority has responded or not to an application.  Regulations may also stipulate the information to be included in the register, and the circumstances when an application or notification may be removed from it.  The inclusion of this information on the planning register is intended to lead to the accurate recording of the number of homes permitted via PDRs. The section requiring LPAs to include prior approval applications and prior notifications on the planning register has commenced (new section 69A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990), but a development order prescribing the information to be recorded is outstanding. A draft Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order - 2017? December 2016’s ‘The Neighbourhood Planning Bill: Further information on how the Government intends to exercise the Bill’s delegated powers’(the ‘further information document’) includes a draft amendment to the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, which relates solely to housing prior approval applications that will create additional dwellings.  If it were brought into force as drafted, LPAs would have to keep all information submitted with, or in respect of a housing prior approval applications in its planning register, including any statement specifying the net increase in dwellinghouses proposed by the development, and any legal agreements. Given that the amendment to the Order has been drafted, and the May Government’s (and probably the new Government's) desire to monitor the number of new homes being built or converted, one can expect this provision to be fully in force by the end of the year. Changes to permitted development rights for drinking establishments During the passage of the Act, there was much debate regarding PDRs and pubs, and some MPs and Lords expressed strong concerns regarding pub closures.  The outcome of these debates is that the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (GPDO) was legally required to be amended as set out by section 15. The main change is that the previously available PDRs for the change of use or demolition of drinking establishment have been removed.  The Lords had sought to delete Use Class A4*, drinking establishments, but the Government thought that this would risk unintended consequences, and would limit opportunities for pubs to expand without seeking planning permission. The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2017 As required by the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017, and within the timescale promised in the Lords, amendments to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 removing certain PDRs for pubs will come into force on 23 May 2017.   The Lichfields’ ‘Guide to the Use Classes Order’ has been updated to reflect this change. The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2017 (‘GDPO amendment’) removes PDRs to change drinking establishments (use class A4) to use class A1 (shops), A2 (financial and professional services), or A3 (restaurants).  Temporary rights to change from a drinking establishment, or ‘a drinking establishment with expanded food provision’ to a school, and to use classes A1, A2 or A3, will also be removed at the same time (Article 3 of the Amendment Order). ‘Drinking establishments with expanded food provision’, where a pub or other drinking establishment use operates concurrently with a use falling within Class A3, is a new typology that has been introduced by the GPDO amendment.  ‘Drinking establishments with expanded food provision’ are not defined further. New Class AA PDRs added to Part 3, Schedule 2 will permit change of use from drinking establishments to drinking establishments with expanded food provision, with no limitations or conditions.  Drinking establishments with expanded food provision may not change to a restaurant without applying for planning permission. Planning permission will also be required to demolish a drinking establishment, or a drinking establishment with expanded food provision. As a consequence of the removal of these rights, the current requirement to establish with the LPA whether the drinking establishment has been nominated as an asset of community value will be removed, as it is no longer relevant. There are transitional arrangements: where a request for confirmation from the LPA as to whether the building has been nominated or listed as an asset of community value was made more than 56 days before 23 May, the development can begin.  For demolition, prior approval must have been granted, determined to not be required or deemed granted before 23 May. New permitted development right Class AA is postponed for 18 months, for buildings which fall within the scope of an Article 4 direction that withdraws permission to change use from Class A4 to Class A3.  This will give LPAs sufficient time to draft and then advertise any amendments to an Article 4 Direction, or prepare any new Article 4 Directions that are considered necessary. Compensation rules relating to Article 4 directions are being amended to reflect the new Class AA right. Local accountability for New Town Development Corporations Section 16 will allow the transfer of functions under the New Town Act 1981 from central government to one or more local authorities within the area proposed for a New Town. Regulations can then be made for how the local authority should oversee the New Town's development. It was added to the Bill at Third Reading in the Lords, in an amendment tabled by Lord Taylor, Lord Best and Lord Lucas, and followed an earlier debate during the passage of the Bill, which led to subsequent discussions between Lord Taylor and DCLG officials, and to referencing the (then future) amendment (being referred to) in the Housing White Paper (para 1.36). Consequently the amendment was accepted by the Government. At Third Reading Lord Taylor argued: “In the modern world, it is not right that in seeking to deliver a new settlement through a new town corporation to ensure that it is delivered at quality and pace to meet local needs a local council would surrender all the powers to the Secretary of State... This is a localising measure. It hands really strong power to communities to ensure that new towns are delivered at quality.​” The draft regulations will need to be approved by resolution of each House of Parliament. New government - new DCLG ministers and a new approach? In my view, a new Conservative government would be unlikely to change tack on the development management changes outlined here (despite the pub PDR changes being rushed through).  Furthermore, Gavin Barwell has dropped a number of heavy hints about his desire to return to the Department of Communities and Local Government, and should this happen, an altered approach is even less likely. Expect full steam ahead from 19 June. Sources Improving the use of planning conditions, public consultation Government response to the consultation on improving the use of planning conditions The Neighbourhood Planning Bill: Further information on how the Government intends to exercise the Bill’s delegated powers The Neighbourhood Planning Bill 2016/2017 Delegated Powers Memoranda *Use Class A4 ‘drinking establishments’ includes public houses, pubs, and bars  

CONTINUE READING