Planning matters blog | Lichfields

Planning matters

Our award winning blog gives a fresh perspective on the latest trends in planning and development.

Levelling-up and Regeneration Act gains Royal Assent
The Levelling Up and Regeneration Act received Royal Assent today, 26 October.
Most of the sections directly related to development management and plan-making have not commenced and will require secondary legislation.
The provisions relating to land dealings and housing delivery are among the only planning-related sections to have a known commencement date. This appears to demonstrate the importance that the Government is placing on seeking to address concerns raised by MPs and the Lords, regarding their perception that planning permissions are not built out swiftly enough and that land-banking is taking place at scale (notwithstanding evidence to the contrary) and ahead of the outcomes of the Competition and Markets Authority's work in the housing sector.
Below is a summary of the key planning-related sections that will apply in England. The summary does not make reference to the proposed secondary legislation and policy which, as explained via consultation documents, would deliver the policy intention of the new Levelling up and Regeneration Act 2023.
Planning-related sections of the Act for which a commencement date is known or partially known, are as follows:
Information about land dealings and legislation intended to encourage build out:
  1. The introduction of commencement notices and completion notices, power to decline to determine applications in cases of earlier non-implementation and a condition requiring development progress reports. These provisions are intended to encourage build out and facilitate the tracking of housing delivery; this will require completion within a given timeframe where considered appropriate. Most of these sections have come into force, in so far as they confer a power to make regulations, in two months’ time, to allow the necessary legislation to be made.
     
  2. The collation of information about dealings and interests in land and the making of this data public. This section has commenced, but secondary legislation is still required for its conferral.
Environmental outcomes reports:
  1. Environmental Outcomes Reports, which would replace Environmental Impact Assessment, Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment.  These sections will come into force in two months’ time, but secondary legislation is still required.
Other key planning related sections of the Act, which do not have yet have an appointed commencement date, include:
Plan-making:
  1. A streamlined 30 month plan-making system, including supplementary development plans and area-wide design codes forming part of the development plan, formal repealing of the duty to cooperate, and voluntary joint spatial strategies.
     
  2. The content of development plans and spatial strategies, to be included under the new system of plan-making.
Development management:
  1. Stronger weight to be given to the development plan, which would not repeat new National Development Management Policies (NDMPs). NDMPs would trump other national policy and development plan policy.
     
  2. A new Section 73B route to vary planning permissions, which can include descriptions of development but must not create a substantially different effect from that of the existing permission (secondary legislation not required, but no commencement date yet).
     
  3. An Infrastructure Levy, to replace the Community Infrastructure Levy at local level and to incorporate affordable housing contributions.
     
  4. Heritage related provisions, including providing Scheduled Monuments, Protected Wreck Sites, Registered Parks and Gardens, Registered Battlefields, World Heritage Sites with the same status as Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas, to which there is a general statutory duty to have special regard.
     
  5. Enforcement provisions, including that LPAs will have ten years to take enforcement action (still four years in Wales for certain breaches).
Other Matters:
  1. Changes to compulsory purchase order procedures, including the removal of ‘hope value’ compensation when certain public authorities exercise compulsory purchase powers related to housing, education, or health facilities.
     
  2. High street rental auctions to allow LPAs to designate a street or specified area as locally important, meaning if a property is empty for a year LPAs can instigate a rental auction.
     
  3. Community Land Auctions designed to capture the value uplift of sites when they are allocated in a local plan.
     
  4. Digitisation, including compliance with data standards by local authorities and planning applicants.
Lichfields will provide detailed analysis of these planning reform proposals, and how each would work in practice via policy and secondary legislation, in due course. Subscribe to receive our blogs and fresh perspectives straight to your inbox. 
 

CONTINUE READING

The Government’s long-term plan for housing – what’s new?
In advance of the Royal Assent of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill (LURB) and publication of responses to several consultations, notably on amendments to the NPPF, the Levelling Up Secretary, Rt Hon Michael Gove MP has made a speech setting out the direction of travel for planning for housing. 
The announcements have been made amongst a plethora of concurrent planning reform and tweaking of the existing system. This gives the impression of a Government still testing the water on various policy issues, in various ways, prior to preparing for an election and responding to the scrutiny of recent policy approaches. The delays to the LURB also provide opportunities to slot in potentially popular and/or pragmatic legislation.
The headlines are dominated by the “Heseltinian approach” to urban regeneration, and the promotion of a significant Cambridge expansion. But planners in all sectors will be interested in development management proposals, including: new permitted development rights, funding for ‘upskilling and clearing the backlog’ and a ‘more permissive approach’ to small pockets of brownfield land.
 
Ten new planning proposals in the long-term housing plan
There are ten news items that stand out in a plan mostly comprised of re-commitments.
  1. The amendments to the NPPF consulted on in December will be published “a little later this year” and the LURB is expected to gain Royal Assent subsequently this year. A regeneration focus is “guiding its [The Government’s] consideration of responses to the consultation”, indicating that decisions have not yet been made and will be refined in response to speeches and press releases such as those made on 24th July.

  2. Plans for Cambridge, inner-city London and central Leeds were announced “following the commitment in the Levelling Up White Paper to regenerate 20 places”. The Government plans for Cambridge to be Europe’s science capital within a new quarter, 65,000 homes at Docklands 2.0 in east London and Leeds regeneration and potential mass transit system.
     
  3. Investing in "quality planning": over £24 million of additional investment (although the BBC suggests only half of this is new money not to be taken from current DLUHC budgets). A “planning super squad” will be created using £13.5 million of funding and first deployed to Cambridge. The investment will also support the eight investment zones in England. See below for more on this elements of the proposals.
     
  4. A pragmatic approach to amending planning permissions is needed. Mr Gove said the Government “is clear that […] Local councils should be open and pragmatic in agreeing changes to developments where conditions mean that the original plan may no longer be viable, rather than losing the development wholesale or seeing development mothballed”. This is a very positive acknowledgement of larger schemes in particular. In the context of the LURB, this statement is possibly a nod to the proposed new amendment procedure, section 73B, and potentially Lord Lansley’s proposed clause that would provide for regulations that would set out a procedure for drop-in applications.
     
  5. A new permitted development rights (PDRs) consultation, proposes new and amended PDRs relating to rural diversification and for the reuse and extension of urban and rural properties for housing and other uses. The consultation also covers the application of design codes and “providing more certainty over some types of development”.
     
  6. A future PDRs consultation for householders to come in the Autumn.
     
  7. A more permissive approach to small pockets of brownfield land is proposed. How this is to be achieved has not yet been set out, but it is intended to benefit SME builders.
     
  8. Second stair cores for tall buildings. The Government has confirmed its intention to mandate second staircases in new residential buildings above 18 metres, following support for this threshold from the relevant experts. This clarity was widely expected. It is encouraging that DLUHC is to work with industry and regulators over the summer to ensure transitional arrangements to secure “the viability of projects which are already underway, avoiding delays where there are other more appropriate mitigations”.
     
  9. Intervention in London – Mr Gove is critical of the Mayor of London’s record on housing, but said that he would work with the Mayor (whoever that might be?). However, his final tone indicated what would happen if collaboration broke down: “We are planning to intervene [in London], using all the arms of government, to assemble land, provide infrastructure, set design principles, masterplan over many square miles and bring in the most ambitious players in the private sector, to transform landscapes which are ripe for renewal. Our ambition in London is a Docklands 2.0 – an eastward extension along the Thames of the original Heseltine vision. […] Making sure we unlock all the potential of London’s urban centre – while also preserving the precious low-rise and richly green character of its suburbs. […] Which is why I reserve the right to step in to reshape the London Plan if necessary and consider every tool in our armoury – including development corporations”.

  10. Cambridge as a land value capture pilot? The Government notes the significant infrastructure requirements of the proposed new quarter in Cambridge - an initiative which some politicians in Greater Cambridge are resisting - and also the increase in land values that will arise from permissions for the new quarter being granted.
The Government also notes the existing viability guidance on existing use value plus a premium and says: “The government intends to explore recommendations about what a reasonable premium to agricultural landowners should be. Building on this approach, the government intends that a consultation will be undertaken to inform the policy on a reasonable premium for landowners above existing use value, to support the development of plans for the new quarter. To the extent that infrastructure and affordable housing need justifies this position, the government anticipates that policy will be set to capture land value uplift above the premium. This will enable landowners to receive fair compensation for their land while minimising the public sector investment required to bring the development forward”.
  

Capacity and capability improvements

The “Long-term plan for housing” announcements also included the launch of the new Capacity and Capability Programme for planning, designed to train and upskill existing planners, as well as creating new pathways into the profession at a graduate level. The application process began on 24th July and the intention is to allocate funds during October 2023.
A planning super-squad
At the core of the announcement is a Capacity and Capability programme, supported by a pot of £24 million to “scale up local planning capacity” through the Planning Skills Delivery Fund, and an additional £13.5 million to stand up a new “super-squad” of experts to unblock major housing and infrastructure developments. This team, once assembled, will first be placed in Cambridge to deliver the government’s ambitious housing and industry plans here. After this, the “super squad” will move to England’s eight Investment Zones announced so far, with the aim of delivering on their core objectives.
Clearing the application backlog with a £24m Planning Skills Delivery Fund
The Planning Skills Delivery Fund (PSDF) will provide £24 million over two years to local authorities to help clear the backlog of planning applications and support them with the implementation of the proposed reforms in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill.

In short, local authorities can apply for funding of up to £100,000 per local authority, to support them in either clearing the backlog or filling skills gaps - with priority given to applications to clear the backlog.
Local authorities seeking backlog funding must set out the causes, nature and scale of their backlog and identify ways in which it can be cleared, as well as demonstrating how receipt of the funding would reach the root cause of the problem. This acknowledgement that “money is not enough” follows from the fees consultation and further strengthens our understanding the government’s view on this matter.
Local authorities that are applying for skills funding must demonstrate areas in which they are lacking resource and put forward a case for how the introduction of a specialist resource in their department would deliver on a set of identified objectives.
Finally, the guidance states “the intention of the year one application process is to focus on projects and change that could be delivered within 6 months” and that that Secretary of State retains the right to withdraw the funding.
The funding is not to be used to support a local authorities’ role in the determination of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs). Financial support with the determination of NSIPs will be provided through the second round of the Innovation and Capacity Fund [launched on the 25th July] to “support and enhance the ability of local authorities to engage in the Development Consent Order process for NSIPs”. 
The envisaged timeline for round one of the funding is that the after applications close on 11 September they will be assessed during September and the successful authorities announced in October 2023.
Upskilling Measures
There is a recommitment to support for the RTPI’s planning bursary for 50 post-graduate students, the LGA’s Planning Graduate Programme, designed initially for 30 people and a two-year extension of funding to the Planning Advisory Service (PAS), to include a skills audit within local authorities to identify skills gaps and opportunities for future development. DLUHC says PAS needs to allow for the continuation up-skilling within Local Authorities, as well as providing “targeted technical training, to address both the current skills gaps and to build readiness for change that will be required to meet the needs of the future planning system”.
Application fees
These funding and upskilling programmes, along with the draft fees regulations having been laid in Parliament, are an indication that while we still await a formal response to the Government’s consultation on increasing application fees in the interest of better performance, the ‘increasing fees’ element of planning reform imminent. Indeed, the Government confirmed they will be “Increasing the amount developers pay in planning fees, following our recent consultation, to ensure all planning departments are better resourced.”
Sean Farrissey’s blog provides useful insight into the implications of that consultation and the draft fee regulations, in particular exploring how a simple cash boost may not be enough to get to the root of many problems that are embedded in the system.
 
 

Concluding remarks - A long-term vision?

The emphasis on long-term vision within the latest announcements relates to there being limited immediate change proposed. As always, it is tempting to judge policy announcements as much by what is absent than what is present: the focus is indeed on the medium to long-term, with an eye to to discrediting Labour’s approach to planning reform at the next local elections in May 2024 and general election due by January 2025.

In simple terms, the Conservative government is reiterating its commitment to beauty, backed with infrastructure and delivering homes through density, presumably with the intention of positioning the opposition as opposed to these principles.

We must wait a little longer to learn how the responses to the NPPF consultation and indeed the LURB itself progresses, to see how policy will match the vision.
The more immediate improvements to planning skills and resourcing are good news.

CONTINUE READING