Traditional consultation events such as public exhibitions often attract time-rich individuals in the community who hold strong views about development (and not always positive ones). However, communities are not single entities and it is important to find ways of encouraging the ‘silent majority’ - those who would not normally participate in the planning process but who could stand to gain from it - to engage.
In today’s 21st cyber century, promoting participation through the use of social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is thought to help to ensure that online communities ‘Friend’, ‘Follow’ and ‘Like’ proposed developments. But does the use of social media in the development sector also have unintended consequences that need to be anticipated and addressed?
There is no doubt (particularly to a Generation Y millennial like me) that sharing information and consulting on development proposals via social media platforms is a more relevant way to engage in the ‘digital by default’ world that we live in.
Other pros include:
Inclusivity: Traditional face-to-face methods of engagement are often dominated by the vocal minority. Online, via social media platforms, the silent majority may, however, be more likely to voice their opinions and engage in the consultation process.
Accessibility: Information can be spread quickly and accessed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. With a tap on a phone or tablet, previously disengaged and underrepresented groups can become involved, respond and comment on consultations on pre-application projects, and on planning applications, with ease and speed.
Reach: In the UK, Facebook has a total of 44 million active users and Twitter 14 million. If used effectively, they can form part of a tailored engagement strategy to reach out to interest groups or to find out what the community at large is thinking.
Although there are clearly a number of pros, social media can also be counterproductive. Cons include:
Fake news: Just as prospective developers might want to set out their case and encourage instant and meaningful online consultation, self-appointed ‘anti-social mediaists’ can try to undermine and disrupt engagement and consultation projects by spreading misinformation, rumours and echo chambers.
Representation: The digital landscape has no geographical boundaries. As such, whilst social media platforms provide the opportunity to reach out to a wider demographic, there is a danger that feedback may not be representative of the local community/ those actually impacted locally.
Cyberactivism: Social media can be used as a way to mobilise NIMBY opposition and achieve digital activism objectives. Although unlike a localised neighbourhood petition gaining momentum as a result of door-to-door canvassing, e-campaigning is fast and far-reaching.
Based on the above pros and cons, should property developers be using social media to engage with the public as part of consultation processes? Interestingly, a survey undertaken by Remarkable Group and pollster YouGov, which involved asking over 1,400 UK councillors their opinions on social media in relation to planning consultation, found that:
75% of the 1,401 councillors interviewed said social media is an important or very important engagement tool;
34% believed public responses gathered via social media should be included as part of a Statement of Community Involvement (SCI);
60% believed developers should be engaging with local communities through social media; and
74% believed social media would add value when reviewing planning applications.
The importance and value of social media in planning-related consultations should not be taken for granted, although whether we will see application site notices and local plan and neighbourhood planning letters replaced with push notifications sent direct to smartphones - and church hall public exhibitions superseded by online forums - in the short term remains to be seen. But moving forward, using social media should be considered as a potentially vital component in a developer’s consultation and engagement strategy, whether it’s for monitoring social media activity, or actively engaging with it.
At Lichfields, we recognise the potential power and value of social media platforms and consider that digital outreach cannot be ignored. We know how to capitalise on the pros and combat the cons in development strategies. For more information please contact us.
26 May 2017
Lichfields has published its most recent insight Rural estates: economic benefits of rural tourism. This time we have turned our attention to rural areas and the potential for country estates to diversify their existing operations, to include provision of tourist accommodation. With the political and economic backdrop in flux, we consider that this is a market in which landowners and estate managers could make gains, while at the same time providing jobs and stimulating investment in the rural economy.
Some of our key findings are set out below.
The tourism industry throughout the UK is flourishingIt grew at a rate almost double that of the rest of the UK economy between 2000 and 2016. This trend looks set to continue.
This equates to significant economic gainsIt is anticipated that some 630,000 additional jobs in tourism will be generated between 2013 and 2025, at a value to the tune of £130.5 billion. That’s more than double its present value.
The countryside looks set to benefitVisits to rural areas have consistently accounted for 20% of all domestic tourist trips. If this proportion is maintained, as it is expected to be, then the growth forecasted in the sector as a whole presents significant opportunities for rural landowners.
There are many business models open to those seeking to tap into this marketFrom relatively ‘intensive’ operations such as hotels and guesthouses through to ‘lower commitment’ options such as camping, there is a range of different products which could be matched to any given country estate. Which one is right for will depend on locational and site specific attributes.
Hotels are the most popular model for visitorsHotels, along with guesthouses, B&Bs and self-catering properties, attract 86% of stays in Scotland. Hotels also attract the highest spend per person per night and present the best opportunity for year-round bookings. However, these models also entail the greatest ‘commitment’, property-wise.
Other niche accommodation types may be better suited to some country estatesWhile hotels and other traditional types of accommodation may be the most popular in the round, camping, glamping and AirBnB can also present profitable diversification models, with lower start-up and maintenance costs. While these models may result in fewer direct employment opportunities, they still make contributions to the local economies that they operate within.
Planning is key to unlock the value in rural estatesEconomic impact is a material consideration in the determination of planning applications. Due to the remote nature of the majority of rural areas, making a compelling planning case for development that clearly articulates the positive economic impact of any proposal and balances this against any locational disadvantages is paramount to success.