06 Jan 2021
“The potential benefits of purpose built student accommodation must be balanced against any negative impacts arising from significant concentrations that might be harmful to the sustainability of residential communities.” - SG10: Meeting Housing Needs, Paragraph 2.6
Glasgow is Scotland's largest city and is recognised by students for its vibrant nightlife. The city is home to 5 universities, University of Glasgow, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow School of Art, Royal Conservatoire of Scotland as well as number colleges. The University of Glasgow is currently rated 11th in the UK and with living costs approximately 35% cheaper than London it’s a highly desirable location.
Glasgow is home to approximately 130,000 students, with the 3 major university’s University of Glasgow, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Caledonian University attracting 28,000, 22,000 and 20,000 students respectively each year.
In February 2019, the Council consulted with students, student housing providers, universities, elected members and community councils on the City’s student accommodation. They have now drafted a revision to Section 2: Student Accommodation of their Supplementary Guidance 10 document (SG10: Meeting Housing Needs). Consultation on this revision is running until 22nd January 2021. This is within a backdrop of predictions that Glasgow’s student accommodation will continue to increase.
The new guidance, if approved, could see new developments for student accommodation in parts of the city restricted. Whilst student accommodation is recognised in essence as residential, it is sui generis in planning terms as there are fundamental differences between traditional residential properties and student accommodation. The council is concerned that the over concentration of student accommodation in certain locations could be harmful to existing residents.
South Partick, Yorkhill and Townhead are all areas of the city in which Glasgow City Council recognise there has been substantial student development and any further development could undermine residential amenity. Therefore, if the policy is approved, further develop in these locations is unlikely to be supported by the council.
The current adopted City Plan does not provide specific policy relating to student housing but it does state that the Council will in general support purpose-built student accommodation which achieves a high standard of amenity and an appropriate range of accommodation, and is adjacent to main campuses or in locations with good public transport and active travel connections. The proposed supplementary guidance provides city-wide criteria that all future developments will be assessed against:
Will not undermine character and amenity
Will not place unsustainable pressure on local amenities and facilities
Access to shops, services, healthcare, leisure and community facilities
Ground floor uses which are open to everyone
Usable open space and enhanced public realm
Design which respects the existing arrangements of properties in the area
Flexible floor designs to allow for future adaption
The applicant will also be required to:
Prepare a statement of need to ensure proposals do not lead to an oversupply which could lead to under-performing or vacant accommodation,
Prepare an analysis of the locality to demonstrate the relationship between the existing place and its capacity for student accommodation, and
Adhere to minimum space standards for study bedrooms.
This assessment criteria will most notably change the amount of analysis that will be required by applicants to justify their proposed development.
In addition, there is also a greater push on mixed developments. Applications within the city centre and in Strategic Development Framework Areas will be expected to also provide mainstream housing on sites greater than 0.3 hectares as follows:
Student housing providers with an interest in Glasgow should take note.
Do you have a potential proposal for student housing in South Patrick, Yorkhill and Townhead? If you wish us to make a representation on your behalf to SG10: Meeting Housing Needs or if you are interested in student housing development in Glasgow, or elsewhere in Scotland, please get in touch with Lichfields.
 QS World University Rankings 2020
 Expatistan, December 2020
 Glasgow City Council, SG10: Meeting Housing Needs
 Expat.com, August 2019Image credit: Adam Marikar via Unsplash
07 May 2020
With the world and society in the midst of a paradigm shift in how we socialise, go about business or even go to the shops, planning reform in Scotland continues. The Scottish government’s consultation on NPF4 ended on 30 April with this being the first of the major changes arising out of last year’s Planning (Scotland) Act to start filtering through.
Lichfields has prepared and submitted a response to the consultation, specifically focussing on its Housing Technical Discussion Paper. The Technical Paper sets out the Scottish government’s initial thoughts on how housing need and demand will be planned for as part of an enhanced NPF which will for the first time form part of the statutory development plan. With housing supply targets/housing land requirements now being set to be included within NPF instead of strategic development plans and/or local development plans, there are a host of considerations about how best to plan for housing.
Building on our experience across Scotland as well as best practice from elsewhere in the UK, we’ve set out our suggestions, the key findings and recommendations of which include:
Streamlining in the setting of housing land requirements is welcomed but must not come at the expense of robustness and transparency;
The focus should be on outcomes, namely the delivery of homes, not simply land that homes could be built on;
We must plan looking forward, based on need, demand and policy objectives, not past trends;
Consistency in approach across Scotland will lead to greater transparency and efficiency both in formulation and scrutiny;
Housing Land Audits should be standardised and include housing trajectories and monitoring of delivery with realistic programming for all sites included. Lichfields ‘Start to Finish’ research is a good starting point for understanding the length of time housing sites take to come forward;
NPF must require that LDPs maintain a minimum 5 year supply of truly deliverable effective land for housing at all times – this will require ongoing monitoring during the 10 year plan cycles we’re moving toward with steps for mid-cycle intervention if necessary;
Deliverable land must be identified for the entire plan period;
Viability and marketability should play an enhanced role in considering the effectiveness of land for housing and its distribution around plan areas.
We’re looking forward to seeing how this pans out and hope that the significant opportunity to shake up how we plan for and deliver housing is grasped.