Housing Land Requirement - Edinburgh case study

Edinburgh

(increased surplus)

We have looked at several local authorities in more detail which have resulted in varying performances based on the two methods. A snapshot of these authorities’ performance during the current plan period is shown below showing the years where a full set of data is available. 
 
Based on the 2019 Housing Land Audit, Edinburgh would have been in deficit based on the residual method in 2019, however, would have had a significantly higher performance based on the average method. By 2023, this could be expected to be resolved with a more positive performance based on the residual method as the significant increase in forecast completions from 2018 is taken into account and the compounded five year requirement starts to reduce.  Should these projected completions be accurate, the housing land requirement will be met and there will be a surplus in housing land supply.
 
It is noteworthy that all years where there is positive performance against both calculations, these are on the basis of projected completions rather than the actual performance of the housing land supply.
 
 

Next case study: Glasgow

Previous section: What are the real world implications?

Disclaimer: This publication has been written in general terms and cannot be relied on to cover specific situations. We recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from acting on any of the contents of this publication. Lichfields accepts no duty of care or liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material in this publication. Lichfields is the trading name of Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Limited. Registered in England, no.2778116

Image credit: Square Lab via Unsplash