A key issue of concern expressed in some sectors including by Welsh Government has been around the issue of ‘land banking’. This issue formed part of a wider ranging
review by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) who reported back in February 2024. The CMA found that:
“42. Overall, we do not consider that competition in the land market, or the land banks held by different housebuilders individually or in aggregate either locally or nationally, is significantly distorting competition between housebuilders in delivering houses. While it is likely that the amount of land being held in housebuilders’ land banks is above the level we would see in a well-functioning market, this is primarily a symptom of wider problems in the market, mainly driven by the time and uncertainty associated with obtaining planning permission. Artificially reducing the levels of land banks without addressing these underlying drivers would be most likely to have a negative effect on the amount of housing that is being built.”
The CMA view then is that the primary issues surrounding delivery of new housing in Wales is the functioning of the planning system and not land banking.
In relation to the planning system the CMA found that:
“58(b)… there is a lack of predictability for housebuilders when navigating the system, the process is significantly costly, lengthy and complex, and there are mixed and inconsistent incentives for LPAs to meet housing need.”
The CMA proposed several recommendations for reform to the planning system:
Option 2.1: More objective and effective use of targets to ensure housing need is met.
Option 2.2: Effective monitoring and enforcement of local plans to encourage housebuilders to bring forward successful planning applications and build new houses.
Option 2.3: Streamlining the planning system to significantly increase the ability of housebuilders to begin work on new projects sooner and bring forward marginal projects which may have previously been non-viable due to the costs of taking them forward.
Welsh Government published its response to the CMA study in October 2024 and was seemingly of the view that no changes to the planning system were required. Certainly, no significant changes to the planning system have subsequently been enacted to promote increased housing delivery.
In Lichfields view this was a missed opportunity, and it is an issue that should be addressed by which ever administration is responsible for planning following the Senedd elections in May 2026.
The lack of up-to-date LDPs in Wales and the protracted time taken to undertake reviews is in Lichfields view the main reason for poor housing delivery. Wales like the rest of the UK has a plan led system. The difference in Wales is that there is no fail safe to ensure housing delivery is maintained if there isn’t an up-to-date plan.
In the last five years (2021-2025) only two new LDPs (Bridgend and Flintshire) have been adopted in Wales whilst most of the remaining are stuck in the preparation stage for significantly longer than the 3 ½ years prescribed in the DPM. Over half of the LDPs in Wales are now time expired and fail to provide a positive basis for future housing delivery.
Since TAN1 was revoked in March 2020 there is no policy mechanism to support developers in coming forward with new sites to remedy the poor delivery. Lichfields considers that a proper monitoring and action policy (with appropriate triggers and actions in the event of under delivery) will be essential so that Wales is able to deliver the quantum of houses that is required to meet identified need. The existence of such a mechanism would also give impetus for Council’s to ensure up to date LDP coverage.